Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:26 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Rolf B. Gainer, Ph.D. Super Risks on Super Bowl Sunday Couch potatoes beware, Super Bowl Sunday may put you at risk for cardiovascular events. A German study conducted during the FIFA World Cup in 2006 and published in the New England Journal of Medicine (V 358:475-483, January 31, 2008, Number 5) found a relationship between emotional stress and the incidence of cardiovascular events.4279 patients with cardiovascular events occurring during the World Cup matches were assessed. The incidence rate during game days was 2.66 that during the control periods. The rate for men was 3.26 that of the control period and 1.82 for women. For individuals with known coronary heart disease the rate soared to 47.0% as compared to 29.1% during the control period. The highest incidence was observed during the first two hours at the beginning of each match. The study revealed that watching a stressful match doubled the risk of a cardiovascular event and suggested that individuals with known coronary heart disease take measures to reduce stress associated with watching the match. While we normally don't equate the Super Bowl with a heart attack, this study identifies that there is a clear risk which is further increased for individuals with a history of heart disease. Our culture puts a lot of attention of the Super Bowl and the event has become an institution marked by parties, overindulgence in food and drink and stress about who will win or lose. So, sports fans be careful on Sunday. Even those who watch from the couch are at risk.
link to this post  8:25 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Empathetic listening is important in both personal and professional relationships Being an empathetic listener is important in both personal and professional relationships, not only because of the relational consequences that you may suffer from not showing empathy but also because people are valuable and simply need to be treated as important. Ask yourself; do you really put effort and concentration into listening? How does it make you feel when others are not truly listening to you?
Sometimes people are just too busy to demonstrate empathetic listening, or perhaps one has simply never considered what it means to be a good listener. Either way, the consequences of not being an empathetic listener can be devastating. Personal relationships can suffer or ultimately end. Professional relationships can suffer causing distrust, decreased productivity, and poor morale. So then, knowing that we need to be good listeners, just what does it mean to be empathetic? The following is an excerpt of an article from Advance Magazine that discusses some practical tips on empathetic listening:
What does it mean to be empathetic? It means to stand in someone else's shoes and look at life from their reference point. For that moment, you attempt to look at and assess the situation through their eyes. It does not mean that you must agree, simply that you understand what they are saying and how they are feeling. When you can relate to another at this level, you respect them as a human being. And it is this need that people have to feel respected-for simply being alive, for having thoughts and ideas and a perspective-that lessens people's fear of insignificance. It makes people feel important when you show them that they matter simply by listening to them.
Communication is a powerful tool, perhaps the most powerful tool we have as human beings. It has the power to hurt or heal, hinder or help, tear down, tear apart, or bring together. Only 7 percent of communication is verbal. This means, it is what you say when you are not speaking that matters most. This includes your actions, body language, and presence-how you show up in the world through your attitude, mood, and energy-as well as how you do what you do, how you say what you say, and your ability to listen to understand.
Here are 3 steps to mastering the skill of listening:
Click here to read the rest of the article
Click here for information on Brookhaven's outpatient marriage and family counseling services
link to this post  8:03 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR One joint equivalent to the risk of smoking 20 cigarettes Previous studies have equated one joint to five cigarettes with regards to lung damage. However, a new study equates one joint to the damage risk of smoking 20 cigarettes. The study, published in the European Respiratory Journal, stated that those who had smoked on average one joint a day over ten years were 5.7 times more likely to develop lung cancer than those who do not smoke.
According to Dr. Richard Beasley, M.B. Ch.B., of the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, marijuana smoke has twice as many carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons than tobacco. Additionally, marijuana users inhale differently, much deeper, and do not use filters, a bad combination. Due to the prevalence of cannabis use, it is a good idea for physicians to ask suspect patients if they are smoking marijuana. The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that goes into greater detail about the study:
Lung cancer patients were identified from hospital databases or the national cancer registers from 2001 through 2005. Most had non-small-cell lung cancer (80%) and none had lung metastasis from a distant primary.
The proportion of controls who had ever smoked cannabis was 36% after adjustment for the general population age distribution.
Overall, 26.6% of lung cancer patients in the study reported smoking at least 20 joints in their lifetime, whereas 12% of control participants had.
For every one joint-year -- the equivalent of one joint per day for one year -- smoked, the risk of lung cancer rose 8% (relative risk 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.15).
The association between cannabis and lung cancer was strengthened with adjustment for the growth rate of lung cancer, by excluding exposure in the five years before baseline or diagnosis (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18), "as would be expected if a causal association existed."
The association was similar to the 7% risk seen for each pack-year of tobacco smoking (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.09).
Click here to read the entire article
Click here for information on drug treatment options
link to this post  Monday, January 28, 2008 9:26 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Sarah McGee Burgers, Fries, and Diet Soda Are Recipes for Metabolic Syndrome Middle aged adults between the ages of 45 and 64 years old, whom eat a double burger, fries, and a diet soda, increase their chances of metabolic syndrome by 25%. Lyn M. Staffen, Ph.D., of the University of Minnesota, conducted a study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) on the eating habits of more than 9,514 of these middle aged individuals; 3,782 of the individuals had three or more of the risk factors that are typical of metabolic syndrome.
The participants were categorized into either having a Western-pattern diet (refined grains, processed meats, fried foods, red meat, eggs) or a prudent-pattern diet (whole grains, fish and seafood, fruit, vegetables, poultry, Low-fat dairy products). “We specifically studied food intake; since when we start to think about making recommendations it is easier to do so using the framework of real foods, eaten by real people.” The researchers found that, “after adjusting for demographic factors, smoking, physical activity, and energy intake, consumption of a Western dietary pattern was adversely associated with incident (metabolic syndrome)”.
Click here to read a review of the study from Medpage Today
Click here for information on eating disorders
link to this post  Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:34 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Job stress increases heart risk A recent study has found that heart risk is directly affected by stressful jobs, as well as other lifestyle factors. Job stress stimulates neuroendocrine pathways, stockpiling adrenaline, and has indirect effects on the presence of healthy lifestyle behaviors. Analyzing the Whitehall II study of British civil servants, the researchers found that risk for coronary heart disease was increased especially in young office workers due to cumulative work stress.
Comparisons between the stressfulness of US jobs verses jobs in England have yet to be drawn, but researchers assume the key lies in what the workers “perceive” to be stressful. According to Dr. Vincent Bufalino, in conjunction with diet, exercise is a way to release adrenaline created by stress, which helps to relieve the cumulative effects of work-place tension. The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that reviews the study:
"This study adds to the evidence that the work stress-coronary heart disease association is causal in nature," Dr. Chandola and colleagues concluded.
About 16% of stress' effect on the heart was attributable to its impact on the metabolic syndrome while another about 16% was attributed to unhealthy behaviors such as reduced physical activity, diet, and other lifestyle factors.
"We've been trying to understand the mechanisms associated with stress for a long time," commented Vincent Bufalino, M.D., of Edward Hospital in Naperville, Ill., a spokesperson for the American Heart Association.
Although it's not clear how the stress level of government employment in England compares with office work in the U.S., he said the key was likely workers' perceptions that their job produced a stressful environment, which can likely be generalized.
Click here to read the entire article from Medpage Today
link to this post  Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:15 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR “Behavioral Management in Acute Care Settings” On January 9th 2008 Ros Burrows, PhD, presented a talk on “Behavioral Management in Acute Care Settings,” which was a great success. In his presentation, Dr. Burrows offered guidelines for direct care personnel dealing with agitated or aggressive patients. Benefits of behavioral management and behavioral modification were discussed and the benefits of one over the other in acute care settings. Participants were afforded an interactive environment wherein they were able to examine the affects of their own attitudes on patient behaviors and ways they could make themselves more effective in working with them. Lastly, Dr. Burrow's expounded upon two case studies and ways to put a good behavioral philosophy into practice as part of effective patient care.
Dr. Burrows is a clinical neuropsychologist who has specialized in traumatic brain injury for the last 17 years. He has served as Program and Executive Director for three brain injury programs and served five years on the Board of Directors for the Oklahoma Brain Injury Association, including terms as President and Vice President. Dr. Burrows currently has a private practice in Broken Arrow and serves as staff neuropsychologist for Meadowbrook Specialty Hospital, with an emphasis on geriatrics and competency issues.
Click here for more details about his presentation
link to this post  Friday, January 18, 2008 4:32 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR PTSD three times more common in troops “engaged in combat” A recent study revealed that combat, rather than deployment alone, accounts for a sharp increase in new-onset post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among U.S. soldiers. Specifically, PTSD was three times more common in troops “engaged in combat” during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars than those that did not engage. Exposure to combat increased PTSD the most in air force and army troops, perhaps due to the "eyes on" nature of their engagements. Navy and coast guard troops showed decreased odds of PTSD after exposure to combat but still more than double compared to those who had not engaged. According to the authors of the study, "the results... … emphasize that specific combat exposures, rather than deployment itself, significantly affect the onset of symptoms of PTSD after deployment." The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that reviews the study: Combat exposure increased the likelihood of PTSD most for those in the army (odds ratio: 3.59) or the air force (OR: 3.38), found Tyler C. Smith, Ph.D., of the Naval Health Research Center here, and colleagues in a prospective population-based cohort study. The odds were also more than doubled for those exposed to combat in the navy or Coast Guard (OR: 2.48) and Marines (OR: 2.78), they reported online in the BMJ. Overall, the rate of new-onset self-reported symptoms in combat personnel was 4.3% compared with 2.3% in non-combat personnel.
Click here to read the entire article Click here to learn about treatment options for PTSD
link to this post  Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:57 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR How to keep your New Year's resolutions on track It’s a praiseworthy action, creating a list of New Year’s resolutions, but let’s face it, we are human. Realizing our short attention and commitment spans necessitates planning if we are to achieve the goals we have created. The following is a list of ten ideas for keeping your New Year’s resolutions on track: 1. Use a daily goal assessment as a way of checking your progress. Assessing your goals on paper keeps structure in the process of achieving your New Year’s resolutions. 2. Make it a habit. It’s a good idea to associate your assessment and planning time with another predictable continuous activity that you perform on a daily basis, or weekly basis. For instance, you might make your shaving time a moment in which you review that check list plastered to your bathroom mirror. 3. Make sure your goals are attainable. One unattainable goal can crash the rest of your list. If your goals are not attainable, if they are not palatable, then you’re setting yourself up for failure that could translate into feelings of frustration and self-defeat strong enough to make you oust the rest of your list. So keep it simple Simon. 4. Another important point when considering the maintenance of your New Year’s resolutions is to identify stressors. It may well be that the very thing you have resolved to do is becoming irrelevant because of the stress it is causing you. You may need to reframe your goal or the timeline associated with it. 5. Check yourself for excuses about barriers and impediments to progress. What are you doing to deal with those "bumps in the road?” You may just need some motivation. Try giving yourself a pep talk or writing one down on paper that you could read from time to time when you are feeling “an excuse” coming on. 6. Sometimes it’s not the goal you’re having difficulty with but an obstruction preventing you from addressing, or implementing, the goal in the first place. Perhaps your schedule is such that you’re not allowing enough time for implementation or maybe you’re simply allowing random “things” to eat up your time by not creating healthy boundaries. In scenarios like this a minor tweak or two could be the answer. 7. Stay focused on goals that are a priority. Odds are that your list of New Year’s resolutions contains goals that are forthcoming as well as goals that can wait. Don’t frustrate yourself by trying to take on every goal at once. 8. Leave yourself adequate time to balance work, family and personal commitments. You may find that your New Year’s resolutions are eating up time with family, recreation or personal commitments. It may be time to take a step back and see if you have too much on your plate. 9. Avoid engaging in the old, dysfunctional behaviors that derail your progress. This is kind of an “if / then” situation. You may not be planning on dropping the ball but engaging in seemingly unrelated behaviors, or activities, may cause you to. “Sleeping late may eat up your time for, overeating may make you sluggish when,” you get the idea. Avoid derailing your progress with dysfunctional behaviors. 10. Avoid an “all or nothing mentality.” Resolute Ryan, after missing the mark, says, “Well, that’s it. I broke my New Year’s resolution. I guess I can start back up next year.” That kind of thinking will end your progress before it begins. Give yourself room to make a mistake now and then; in fact, expect mistakes. Keeping on track with your New Year’s resolutions is a process of patience and planning. If you are willing to approach your goals intelligently and with preparation you will increase your likelihood of succeeding. I wish you the “best of planning.”
link to this post  2:27 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Rolf B. Gainer, Ph.D. Childhood Tantrums: A Predictor of Later Mental Health Problems Do childhood tantrums predict mental health problems later in life? Andrew Belden, M.D., a post-doctoral fellow of psychiatry at Washington University, School of Medicine has outlined five out-of-the-ordinary types of temper tantrums which may indicate a high risk for depression or other disruptive behavior problems. Dr. Belden's study involved 297 pre-schoolers who were screened by DSM IV standards as either: healthy; depressed; disruptive or depressed and disruptive. The study then examined the frequency of tantrums, the intensity and where the tantrums occurred. Children who consistently hit a parent or caregiver during tantrums and were unable to calm themselves down were found to be at a greater risk for conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity syndrome. Children at a high risk for disruptive disorders which involve hostile behavior towards authority figures, aggression and violence were likely to experience tantrums at least five times a day on multiple days in school or at home than children who were categorized as developing normally. Tantrums which lasted more than 25 minutes were considered another measure of risk. Also, children who hit himself or herself during a tantrum had a definitive link to depression.
Ross Greene, M.D. of Harvard Medical School and the author of The Explosive Child, looks toward defining the anatomy of temper tantrums as key to understanding a child and their future risk. Dr. Greene focuses on using the tantrum to determine what skills the child is lacking and helping them build a repertoire of social and coping skills. Dr. Greene advocates for using a negotiation with the explosive child rather than to have the parent impose their will. Preparing children for disruptions to favored routines and changes is a better method than crisis response according to Dr. Greene. Spanking may, in fact, accelerate or prolong a tantrum and is not regarded a good response.
Dr. Belden offers parents an understanding that 30-40% of healthy children will exhibit violence towards a parent or caregiver on occasion and that does not mean that the child is headed towards a mental health problem. Tantrums are part of the learning process for children to learn to express and manage anger and practice coping skills. All things, which if learned in childhood, can serve us throughout our lives.
link to this post  Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:00 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Stress link to asthma? According to a recent study published in the January issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, children whose mothers are chronically stressed are more likely to have asthma than children whose mothers are not. According to Anita Kozyrskj, Ph.D., Associate Professor at the University of Manitoba, "It is increasingly clear that traditional environmental risk factors do not fully explain the origins of asthma… evidence is emerging that exposure to maternal distress in early life plays a causal role in the development of childhood asthma. In a cohort of children born in 1995, we found that maternal distress which persists beyond the postpartum period is associated with an increased risk of asthma at school-age." The researchers analyzed the medical records of almost 14,000 children native to Manitoba who were registered with Manitoba Health Services from birth in 1995 to 2003 to determine the presence of asthma at age seven. The following is an excerpt of an article from Medical News Today that reviews the study:
Dr. Kozyrskyj and her colleagues analyzed the medical records of nearly 14,000 children born in Manitoba in 1995 who were continuously registered with Manitoba Health Services until 2003. They determined whether the children had current asthma at age seven by analyzing records of doctor visits, hospitalizations and medications in the year of the child's seventh birthday, and related it to maternal distress as defined by doctor visits, hospitalizations and medication for depression and anxiety. Maternal distress was categorized according to onset and duration into four categories: no distress, postpartum distress only, short-term distress and long-term distress.
Click here to read the entire article from Medical News Today
Click here for information on the treatment of stress related problems
link to this post  Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:18 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Sarah McGee Family Mealtime Reduces Eating Disorders in Teens Taking time out of the day and eating regular meals with the family may reduce the risk of eating disorders in teenagers. After a five year evaluation, teenage girls were 29% less likely to suffer from eating disorders, such as purging, binge eating, or using diuretics, than their peers when they ate most of their meals with family throughout the week. Among teenage boys, family meals seemed to have little effect on the presence or absence of eating disorders.
Health care providers play an important role in reinforcing the importance of family meal time. According to Dr. Neumark-Sztainer, “Without being judgmental, providers can help families set realistic goals and come up with creative ways to increase frequency of meals together.” The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that reviews the study:
The prospective findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting family meals play an important role in the health and well-being of adolescent girls. "Health care professionals have an important role to play in reinforcing the benefits of family meals," they said. Without being judgmental, providers can help families set realistic goals and come up with creative ways to increase frequency of meals together, Dr. Neumark-Sztainer added. "This may be eating breakfast together if dinner doesn't work," she suggested. "It can be challenging, I just think we have to put it up there with our priorities." The researchers' Project EAT (Eating Among Teens) study had previously shown that extreme weight control behaviors increased in prevalence from 14.5% to 23.9% as the girls progressed from middle to late adolescence. These behaviors can cause physical and psychological problems, including weight gain, depressive symptoms, and the onset of eating disorders, they noted. Click here to read the entire article
Click here for information on the treatment of eating disorders
link to this post  Friday, January 11, 2008 8:41 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Sarah McGee Study: Girls’ Self Image May Affect Future Weight “Where a teenage girl finds herself on the social ladder during her school years” can determine her weight gain proximity in the future. Over 4000 girls, average age of fifteen, were studied over a two year period. Where they saw themselves ranked among their peers was a determinate factor in weight gain. Although all teenage girls in the study naturally gained some weight over a period of years, girls that thought themselves to be less popular among their peers were 69% more likely to increase their body mass index by 2 units (11 excessive/ unnecessary pounds). Conversely, girls who found themselves to rank higher in popularity also gained weight, but only about 6 ½ pounds. One limitation to the study was that data collected by the researchers was from ‘self-reports” of changes in height and weight, rather than reporting to a physician for documentation. Before collecting data for the study, the researchers took in to account the participant’s weight, BMI, diet, household income, race/ethnicity, and whether or not they had reached puberty. All the teenagers were asked the same questions; for instance, “Where would you place yourself on the ladder?” The ladder represented a social scale from 1-10, 10 being the highest and associated with the most respect from peers and 1 being the lowest. 4, 264 girls ranked themslves 5 or higher on the ladder, while 182 said they were 4 or below on the ladder. The study reflected that teenage girls are sensitive and easily affected by their social environments, possibly affecting physical health and or mental health. Adina Lemeshow, who began the study as a Harvard School of Public Health graduate student, stated, “How girls feel about themselves should be part of all obesity- prevention strategies.” Clea McNeely of John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health called the study strong and stated, “Subjective social status is not just an uncomfortable experience you grow out of, but can have important health consequences.” McNeely went on to state that adults are still the most influential role models in the lives of teenage girls. I believe, as women, it is our job to be examples throughout the lives of these young girls. Respect is not outdated; it is time tested and key to fostering relationships that will increase trust and affect change. Click here to read an article from CNN that discusses the study
link to this post  Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:21 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Increased risk for hypertension, heart attack, and stroke, years after the events of 9/11 Acute stress caused by the 9/11 attacks increased the risk for hypertension, heart attack, and stroke, for years after the event, according to a recent study conducted by Alison Holma, F.N.P., Ph.D., of the University of California at Irvine. The study followed 2,729 adult participants for three years after the attacks in 2001. Participants that reported extreme stress reactions in the days immediately following the attacks were twice as likely to develop hypertension and three times as likely to suffer a heart attack or stroke. The odds ratio for those reporting ongoing worry after the attacks was 4.67 compared to those that did not report ongoing worry. The study has public health implications, specifically with regards to the way that governmental organizations and news agencies communicate risks of terrorist events. According to Dr. Holma, "The message from this research is that we need to be very clear about the way in which we communicate information about terror attacks to the public." The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that reviews the study: The impact of ongoing worry about terror attacks has public health implications "in terms of the way that we communicate risk of events like terror attacks," she said. Dr. Holman said that in the years since 9/11 there have been a number of times when Homeland Security has raised alert levels, but there has been no research to determine the effect these terror alerts have on the health of the general public. "The message from this research is that we need to be very clear about the way in which we communicate information about terror attacks to the public," she said. Raising the alert level may, she said, have the unwanted side effect of increasing worry and anxiety. "To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that acute psychological responses to 9/11 predicted increased incidence in reports of physician-diagnosed cardiovascular ailments for three years in adults, most of whom did not have known existing cardiovascular disease," she wrote. Acute stress response was measured using a modified Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire. Acute stress symptoms, Dr. Holman said, are similar to the symptoms of posttraumatic stress except in the case of acute stress symptoms occurring immediately. Click here to read the rest of this article from Medpage Today
Click here to learn about treatment options for stress related behavioral conditions
link to this post  Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:14 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Alcohol and depression often go hand in hand Alcohol and depression often go hand in hand. Although not everyone that abuses alcohol suffers from depression, depression may fuel the need for alcohol in those that do. People who abuse alcohol and have depression may have a more difficult time quitting as a result. According to a recent study published in the January edition of Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, after treatment for alcoholism you are less likely to remain abstinent if you have co-occurring depression. The study, which was performed by researchers from Minneapolis VA Medical Center, charted the success of 462 people attempting to quit using both alcohol and cigarettes. According to the study, those who had co-occurring depression were 1.5 times more likely to have reported drinking after follow up six months after treatment. Treatment for alcohol abuse that does not address depression is only dealing with half of the problem. According to Molly Kodi, lead author of the study, "our study suggests that treating depression may help people recover from alcohol use problems, although more research is needed on this topic." The following is an excerpt of an article from Medical News Today that reviews the study: At the beginning of the study, participants smoked at least five cigarettes a day and were alcohol dependent. Among the group, typical problematic drinking symptoms included repeatedly imbibing more than planned, difficulty quitting or cutting down, and continuing to drink even though drinking caused problems such as hangovers or sleeping difficulty.
All participants received intensive alcohol and smoking cessation treatment. Up to a year and a half later, researchers surveyed the participants and asked about their alcohol and tobacco habits.
"Among those who were depressed, the odds of drinking, the next time you checked in with them six months later, were 1.5 times greater than the odds of drinking for individuals without significant depressive symptoms," said lead study author Molly Kodl.
Of the people who were depressed, the majority suffered only mild to moderate mood problems.
"With significant depression, people report mood that is down in the dumps, loss of interest in things they used to enjoy, low energy, appetite changes and difficulty concentrating," Kodl said.
While depression seems to lessen the chances of alcohol abstinence, the study did not find a similar association for tobacco dependence. Click here to read the entire article
Click here for information on treatment of co-occurring depression and alcoholism
link to this post  Monday, January 07, 2008 9:11 AM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Depression in female bipolar patients successfully treated with light therapy Light therapy has been successfully used to treat Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD for short). However, there have been limited studies regarding the affects of light therapy on bipolar patients that have depression. According to Dorothy Sitt, M.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, light-box therapy delivered at midday provided complete relief of depressive symptoms in 4 out of 9 female patients in the study, with partial relief being reported in 2 others. Researches reported in the December issue of Bipolar Disorders that therapy worked best between the hours of noon and 2 p.m. According to the researchers, "We found the optimal response was at 7,000 lux midday light for 45 or 60 minutes." The following is an excerpt of an article from Medpage Today that reviews the study: Among nonresponders to the midday treatment, one had a full response when switched to a morning schedule, they said. Another had partial symptom relief with morning treatment. Light therapy is used frequently in patients with seasonal affective disorder, and has been shown to be beneficial in some patients with nonseasonal unipolar depression as well. But it has not been well studied in bipolar depression, Dr. Sit said. Patients were included in the current study if they had a diagnosis of type I or II bipolar disorder without a seasonal pattern and persistent depressive symptoms that had not responded adequately to other treatments. Those with other psychiatric or physical disorders, including recent drug abuse, were excluded. The women took antimanic drugs beginning four weeks before starting light therapy and continuing through the study period. Treatment response was defined as improvement of at least 50% from baseline in scores on the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement.
Click here to read the entire article from Medpage Today
link to this post  Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:01 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Is hoarding a personal problem? This time of year, in light of abundant gifts, gift giving, decorating, and New Year resolutions, people are purposing to get organized. However, there are some people that find that the task of getting organized is much more difficult. According to David F. Tolin, director of the anxiety disorders center at the Institute of Living, reluctance to get organized is sometimes "a personal problem." The fact is that excessive clutter and disorganization can be a sign of something more serious, a health problem. Often time’s people with brain injuries and certain behavioral issues have a more difficult time getting organized. In particular, behavioral issues such as depression, ADD (attention deficit disorder), grieving, and pain issues can cause a lack of desire to become organized. Taking the idea that disorganization and clutter are symptomatic of health issues a bit further, hoarding, although not yet a recognized diagnosis, is a word used to describe chronic disorganization that interferes with a person's quality of life. People that suffer from hoarding find it impossible and even painful to part with items they possess. The good news is that there is hope for the disorganized and those that suffer from hoarding. A recent study showed that people suffering from hoarding experienced increased quality of life and less clutter after a six month period of cognitive behavioral therapy. The following is an excerpt of an article from the New York Times that discusses the issue of disorganization and health: After the holidays, many shoppers load up their carts with storage bins, shelving systems and color-coded containers, all in a resolute quest to get organized for the new year. The country’s collective desire to clean up is evident in the proliferation of organization-oriented businesses like the Container Store and California Closets. Reality shows like “Mission Organization” on HGTV and “How Clean is Your House?” on Lifetime feed a national obsession to declutter. The magazine Real Simple has even created a $13 special issue on cleaning house. Getting organized is unquestionably good for both mind and body — reducing risks for falls, helping eliminate germs and making it easier to find things like medicine and exercise gear. “If you can’t find your sneakers, you aren’t taking a walk,” said Dr. Pamela Peeke, assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of Maryland and the author of “Fit to Live” (Rodale, 2007), which devotes a section to the link between health and organization. “How are you going to shoot a couple of hoops with your son if you can’t even find the basketball?” But experts say the problem with all this is that many people are going about it in the wrong way. Too often they approach clutter and disorganization as a space problem that can be solved by acquiring bins and organizers. Measures like these “are based on the concept that this is a house problem,” said David F. Tolin, director of the anxiety disorders center at the Institute of Living in Hartford and an adjunct associate professor of psychiatry at Yale. “It isn’t a house problem,” he went on. “It’s a person problem. The person needs to fundamentally change their behavior.” Click here to read the entire article from the New York Times
link to this post  Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:45 PM$BlogItemDateTime$>
posted by Aric Thorpe, MHR Psychotropic drugs and weight gain Currently in the United States there is an obesity epidemic. The obesity epidemic is of particular importance to psychiatrists due to the fact that many of the psychotropic drugs they prescribe are associated with weight gain. There are various reasons for this including using particular combinations of drugs and diet, however. One study, focusing on 98 patients with affective psychosis or schizophrenia, found that recipients of atypical-antipsychotic drugs experienced a 7% weight gain in one year. There are several other studies that have explored the relationship between weight-gain and psychotropic drugs. Here is an excerpt of an article from Journal Watch that discusses some of these studies: Some weight-related research might augur psychiatric pharmacogenomics, allowing clinicians to identify patients who are likely to gain weight when taking certain medications. In an animal study, the binding of antipsychotic drugs to histamine H1 receptors paralleled their likelihood of increasing appetite. Clozapine and olanzapine, both strongly associated with weight gain, increased hypothalamic AMP-kinase, which regulates food intake through H1 receptors. Atypical antipsychotics might increase appetite and therefore weight gain through this mechanism, which could become a target for treatment. Other receptors might be involved in antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Increased waist circumference, a core component of the metabolic syndrome, was associated with three polymorphisms of the serotonin 2C receptor gene. Eating more, especially foods that pack a lot of calories into a small volume, is undoubtedly one mechanism of medication-associated weight gain. Animals given high-fat foods showed increased expression of striatal FosB, an early gene product involved in reward signaling. After withdrawal of high-fat or high-carbohydrate foods, animals showed stress responses mimicking those seen after withdrawal from substances that cause physical dependence. Animals also endured an aversive environment to obtain high-fat foods. Any strategy to prevent or treat weight gain must involve an appreciation of the potent effect of food on reward mechanisms.
Click here to read the rest of the article from Journal Watch
link to this post  |
Rolf B. Gainer, Ph.D., Diplomate ABDA, is the Chief Executive Office at Brookhaven Hospital and the Vice President of Rehabilitation Institutes of America. Dr. Gainer has been involved in the design and operation of treatment programs since 1977.
Stephen Harnish, MD is the Medical Director of Brookhaven Hospital. Dr. Harnish is a member of the American Psychiatric Association and is well known in Oklahoma for his informative radio and television appearances.
Aric Thorpe, MHR, is Brookhaven Hospital's Pastoral Liaison Representative. He conducts the quarterly Minister's Lifeline series and provides mental health information to pastors and clergy.
Sarah McGee serves as the Community Education Provider for Brookhaven Hospital. She provides information on mental health and drug and alcohol treatment to healthcare professionals in Oklahoma and surrounding states. |